<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{margin-right:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage18
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D}
.MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
@page WordSection1
{margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt}
-->
</style><style type="text/css" id="owaParaStyle"></style>
</head>
<body lang="DE" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" fpstyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">Hi all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for supporting our point. </div>
<div><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Another point that I was also mentioning to Albert yesterday that in the call for Industry and use-case track, the special sub-topics are not mentioned. Should they be added in this track too? Since the conference encourages
a collaboration between industry and academic research. I see we are also mentioning it in P&D track (as we did last year).</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>--</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div>Mehwish</div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px">
<div><b><font color="993366">Dr. Mehwish Alam</font></b></div>
<div>Postdoctoral Researcher</div>
<div>Information Service Engineering</div>
<div>Phone. +49 7247 808 195<br>
</div>
<div>Fax. +49 7247 808 78195<br>
</div>
<div>FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure</div>
<div>Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1</div>
<div>76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen</div>
<div><font color="993366">www.fiz-karlsruhe.de</font><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRpF257815" style="direction: ltr;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Orga-semantics-2020 [orga-semantics-2020-bounces@lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de] on behalf of Kieseberg Peter [Peter.Kieseberg@fhstp.ac.at]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 17 December 2019 06:53<br>
<b>To:</b> Albert Meroņo Peņuela; orga-semantics-2020@lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [ORGA-SEMANTiCS-2020-EU] DH special track review criteria<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D">Hi,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D">I totally agree with this strategy, especially since I am always refuting to review work from digital humanities based on the same issues: I simply
lack the expertise in the field and the knowledge on criteria.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D">Br. Peter</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Von:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Orga-semantics-2020 <orga-semantics-2020-bounces@lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Albert Meroņo Peņuela<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Montag, 16. Dezember 2019 21:10<br>
<b>An:</b> orga-semantics-2020@lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de<br>
<b>Betreff:</b> [ORGA-SEMANTiCS-2020-EU] DH special track review criteria</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mehwish and I had a chat today about the reviewing criteria for the Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage subtopic call for SEMANTiCS. We expect a number of these submissions to be more "in-use" kind of papers, where standard SW tech
is just applied to solve a DH problem and proper SW contributions are rather implicit. We were a bit concerned that the contributions of these papers might be judged of low novelty in the research track by reviewers if they only expect a pure contribution
to the state of the art of SW.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We're aware that every research paper that makes it to the proceedings must meet the same quality criteria. We thought that this shouldn't really be an issue and we could mitigate it by adopting the following measures:</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- Assign papers of the DH track to appropriate reviewers --this is, to PC members we know have research experience in both DH and SW</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- Once assigned, let these reviewers know that the reviewing criteria is the same for all research submissions, but that DH papers will have an inherent more "in-use" and possibly less "research" side to be considered</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">What would you think of this strategy? We thought it was worth discussing this in the list since the other subtopics might be in a similar situation.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks @Victor for your suggestions</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">@Tassilo Could Mehwish and I get access in Easychair to the PC member list, so we can prepare our reviewer pool?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Albert (also on behalf of Mehwish as DH co-chairs)</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>