[Qrowd] version for submission

[Quinn Ferguson]

Dear Elena et al,



Thank you for all the efforts to date to bring this to where it is.



Please find attached REEEP’s tracked changes on the proposal based on the 
last copy of final version.  Comments earlier on apply to standard naming 
suggestions throughout.



We are missing each partner’s Business Model Canvas as per the standard 
template at the back – we should have this – one page each as previously 
discussed on our calls.



Best,

Quinn



From: qrowd-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de 
[mailto:qrowd-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de] On Behalf Of Elena 
Simperl
Sent: Dienstag, 22. April 2014 16:02
To: Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Subject: [Qrowd] version for submission



Dear all,

please find attached a first version that could be submitted.

Change log:

1. implemented most of the comments of Andreas (I have not yet defined 
Linked Data...)

2. implemented most of Daniel's comments. I have not added exact figures in 
Section 2.1 as I do not have them. I have also not looked into these 
comments:

1.4 Format/Style of the tables, especially "product" column cuts down the 
words --> See my email to Amrapali and Jens.

Section4. Was there a recommendation on how many publications should be 
listed (5 or so)? (Maybe cut down for Ontos and others)



Two typo errors for Dr Andreas Both text "key personnel in QROWD

"serices" instead of "services" and "potentiol" instead of "potential"





People description for INFAI is missing....





​- corporate identify for titles in names...

Dr Jens Lehmann but not for Elena, Markus and Alejandra..***

Re this comment

General:

- We list many data sets that we will use. Is there a plan to create new 
data sets that can be used? If yes can we name them? --> We do mention what 
we do with crowdsourced data and we have public endpoints in WP1

3. addressed comments by Martin K.

4. Updated milestones table and Section 3.4

5. Changed header and footer to match Sections 4 and 5.


I will work on Section 2 now. I'd be very grateful if we could solve the 
issue with the gigantic table in Section 1.4 (it goes over 4 pages!!!). Any 
other comments are welcomed before tomorrow morning.

@Thomas, go ahead and submit this version. I will feed you updated versions 
tonight and tomorrow lunch time.

I assume Thomas will take care of Daniel's comments that refer to Section 4?



XOXO





-- 
Dr. Elena Simperl
Senior Lecturer
Web and Internet Science Group
Electronics & Computer Science
University of Southampton
email: E.Simperl at soton.ac.uk
twitter: https://twitter.com/esimperl
telefone: +44 2380 59 7692
mobile: +44 7900 666705
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pipermail/qrowd/attachments/20140423/acbc1d24/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Binärdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : QROWD-Section_4+5 REEEP Minor Edits.docx
Dateityp    : application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Dateigröße  : 219051 bytes
Beschreibung: nicht verfügbar
URL         : <http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pipermail/qrowd/attachments/20140423/acbc1d24/attachment-0001.bin>