[Qrowd] Qrowd proposal rejected

Do Sep 25 10:24:43 CEST 2014

Hi,

Am 24.09.2014 09:21, schrieb Quinn Ferguson:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Yes, this is disappointing.  However all the work we have put into 
> this proposal can surely be reused and sharpened for a new opportunity.
>
> Looking forward to the possibility of revisiting this and working 
> together in the future.
>
> Thanks to all for your efforts and support.
>

same for me. It was a pleasure to work on this topic and I am quiet sure 
there will be another good opportunity to get the project funded.

Additonally, I heard too that the competition was very though, I also 
get the feedback from a reviewer that there were a lot of very good 
submission and I think they increased the requirements.

Thanks to all for your commitment. I hope to get another opportunity to 
work on a research project with you.

Regards,
Andreas

> Best,
>
> *Quinn**Reifmesser*
>
> *Senior Project Manager | Reegle Product Manager*
>
> *REEEP -- Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership | 
> International Secretariat*
>
> tel:+43 1 26026 3247 | mobile: TBD | skype: reeep_q.ferguson | e-mail: 
> _quinn.reifmesser at reeep.org_
>
> web:www.reeep.org <http://www.reeep.org/> & www.reegle.info 
> <http://www.reegle.info/>
> find us: _twitter.com/REEEP <https://twitter.com/REEEP>_ &www.facebook.com
>
> Vienna International Center D-2166, Wagramerstrasse 5, 1400 Vienna, 
> Austria
>
> REEEP supportsSUSTAINABLE ENERGY FOR ALL 
> <http://www.sustainableenergyforall.org/>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: qrowd-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de 
> [mailto:qrowd-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de] On Behalf Of 
> Elena Simperl
> Sent: Mittwoch, 24. September 2014 08:59
> To: Jens Lehmann; qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
> Subject: Re: [Qrowd] Qrowd proposal rejected
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I guess some of the points they are raising are fair. We were very 
> strong on technology, but maybe not so much on the end-to-end business 
> cases. I wouldn't pay too much attention to the scores. They are 
> lowered down artificially to make sure there is a clear cut between 
> accepted and rejected bids. I guess the main reason why we were not 
> succesful is because we didn't fit 120% in the call, which seems to be 
> essential these days.
>
> Let's try to explore some other calls in the future and revisit the idea.
>
> Elena
>
> On 23-Sep-14 6:08 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Dear all,
>
> >
>
> > sorry to hear this. The competition in H2020 is hard, but I believe
>
> > our proposal got particular harsh reviewers.
>
> >
>
> > I just read the ESR and there is a slightly contradictory statement in
>
> > there: "the planned to be developed crowd-sourcing standalone tools
>
> > include considerable Research and Development effort [...] The
>
> > advances beyond the state of the art exclusively come from the
>
> > innovative integration of existing solutions"
>
> >
>
> > Nevertheless, I hope we can use other opportunities to work together
>
> > in the future.
>
> >
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> >
>
> > Jens
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Am 23.09.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Martin Kaltenböck:
>
> >> Dear all
>
> >>
>
> >> I am very sorry to let you know that our Qrowd proposal has been
>
> >> rejected - we have reached a really bad score on our proposal what
>
> >> makes me personally sad and wondering what we did wrong here -
>
> >> nevertheless many thanks for your good work on this proposal and I do
>
> >> hope we will find other ways for co-operation in the future - best
>
> >> regards - martin
>
> >>
>
> >> PS: see attached the rejection letter & the review result
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> Martin Kaltenböck, CMC
>
> >> Managing Partner, CFO
>
> >>
>
> >> Semantic Web Company (SWC)
>
> >> Mariahilfer Strasse 70 / 8
>
> >> A - 1070 Vienna, Austria
>
> >> Tel +43 1 402 12 35 - 25
>
> >> Fax +43 1 402 12 35 - 22
>
> >> Mobile +43 650 3905697
>
> >>
>
> >> http://www.semantic-web.at
>
> >> http://blog.semantic-web.at
>
> >> http://poolparty.biz
>
> >>
>
> >> LOD2 - Creating Knowledge out of Interlinked Data - http://lod2.eu/
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> Qrowd mailing list
>
> >> Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de 
> <mailto:Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
>
> >> http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/qrowd
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> --
>
> Dr Elena Simperl
>
> Senior Lecturer
>
> Web and Internet Science Group
>
> Electronics & Computer Science
>
> University of Southampton
>
> email: E.Simperl at soton.ac.uk <mailto:E.Simperl at soton.ac.uk>
>
> twitter: https://twitter.com/esimperl
>
> www: https://sites.google.com/site/elenasimperl/
>
> telephone: +44 2380 59 7692
>
> mobile: +44 7900 666705
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Qrowd mailing list
>
> Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de 
> <mailto:Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
>
> http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/qrowd
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qrowd mailing list
> Qrowd at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
> http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/qrowd

-- 

Dr. Andreas Both
Head of Research and Development

Unister GmbH
Barfußgaesschen 11 | 04109 Leipzig | Germany

Phone: +49 (0)341 65050 24496
eMail: andreas.both at unister-gmbh.de
web: http://www.unister.de

Vertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer: Andreas Prokop
Amtsgericht Leipzig, HRB: 19056

-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pipermail/qrowd/attachments/20140925/c55405c2/attachment.html>