[NLP2RDF] NIF and provenance

Rob H Warren warren at muninn-project.org
Thu Dec 18 15:12:35 CET 2014


Philip,

What would be the advantage of adding to NIF versus reusing the PROV ontology for this purpose? I have used this for some projects and have not seen a corner case yet.

-rhw

On Dec 17, 2014, at 5:02 PM, nlp2rdf-request at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
>     as I mentioned to Sebastian briefly, we are working on adding a 
> provenance layer to NIF. And we would like to talk to you.
> 
> I sort of agreed with Sebastian that we could meet in Leipzig to discuss 
> this.
> 
> However, I think it is more efficient if we exchange material beforehand 
> and have a telco early January to discuss the material.
> 
> Sebastian: you mentioned that you have some proposals on how to 
> represent provenance of NIF annotations. Can you share that proposal 
> with us?
> 
> Peter: can you circulate our draft to the people in Leipzig (i.e. 
> Sebastian and Martin).
> 
> We can then start from there and organize a telco in January.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Philipp.
> 
> -- 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster f?r Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universit?t Bielefeld
> 
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano at cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> 
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universit?tsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------



More information about the NLP2RDF mailing list