[NLP2RDF] NIF and provenance
Rob H Warren
warren at muninn-project.org
Thu Dec 18 15:12:35 CET 2014
Philip,
What would be the advantage of adding to NIF versus reusing the PROV ontology for this purpose? I have used this for some projects and have not seen a corner case yet.
-rhw
On Dec 17, 2014, at 5:02 PM, nlp2rdf-request at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> as I mentioned to Sebastian briefly, we are working on adding a
> provenance layer to NIF. And we would like to talk to you.
>
> I sort of agreed with Sebastian that we could meet in Leipzig to discuss
> this.
>
> However, I think it is more efficient if we exchange material beforehand
> and have a telco early January to discuss the material.
>
> Sebastian: you mentioned that you have some proposals on how to
> represent provenance of NIF annotations. Can you share that proposal
> with us?
>
> Peter: can you circulate our draft to the people in Leipzig (i.e.
> Sebastian and Martin).
>
> We can then start from there and organize a telco in January.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster f?r Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universit?t Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano at cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universit?tsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
More information about the NLP2RDF
mailing list