[ORGA-SEMANTiCS-2020-EU] DH special track review criteria

[Alam, Mehwish]

Hi all,

Thanks for supporting our point.

Another point that I was also mentioning to Albert yesterday that in the call for Industry and use-case track, the special sub-topics are not mentioned. Should they be added in this track too? Since the conference encourages a collaboration between industry and academic research. I see we are also mentioning it in P&D track (as we did last year).

--
Best
Mehwish

Dr. Mehwish Alam
Postdoctoral Researcher
Information Service Engineering
Phone. +49 7247 808 195
Fax. +49 7247 808 78195
FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
www.fiz-karlsruhe.de

________________________________
From: Orga-semantics-2020 [orga-semantics-2020-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de] on behalf of Kieseberg Peter [Peter.Kieseberg at fhstp.ac.at]
Sent: 17 December 2019 06:53
To: Albert Meroño Peñuela; orga-semantics-2020 at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Subject: Re: [ORGA-SEMANTiCS-2020-EU] DH special track review criteria

Hi,

I totally agree with this strategy, especially since I am always refuting to review work from digital humanities based on the same issues: I simply lack the expertise in the field and the knowledge on criteria.

Br. Peter

Von: Orga-semantics-2020 <orga-semantics-2020-bounces at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de> Im Auftrag von Albert Meroño Peñuela
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2019 21:10
An: orga-semantics-2020 at lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Betreff: [ORGA-SEMANTiCS-2020-EU] DH special track review criteria

Hi all,

Mehwish and I had a chat today about the reviewing criteria for the Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage subtopic call for SEMANTiCS. We expect a number of these submissions to be more "in-use" kind of papers, where standard SW tech is just applied to solve a DH problem and proper SW contributions are rather implicit. We were a bit concerned that the contributions of these papers might be judged of low novelty in the research track by reviewers if they only expect a pure contribution to the state of the art of SW.

We're aware that every research paper that makes it to the proceedings must meet the same quality criteria. We thought that this shouldn't really be an issue and we could mitigate it by adopting the following measures:

- Assign papers of the DH track to appropriate reviewers --this is, to PC members we know have research experience in both DH and SW
- Once assigned, let these reviewers know that the reviewing criteria is the same for all research submissions, but that DH papers will have an inherent more "in-use" and possibly less "research" side to be considered

What would you think of this strategy? We thought it was worth discussing this in the list since the other subtopics might be in a similar situation.

Thanks @Victor for your suggestions
@Tassilo Could Mehwish and I get access in Easychair to the PC member list, so we can prepare our reviewer pool?

Thanks,
Albert (also on behalf of Mehwish as DH co-chairs)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pipermail/orga-semantics-2020/attachments/20191217/6c5901b4/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz-Institut für Informationsinfrastruktur GmbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB 101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig?in Dr. Angelika Willms-Herget.

FIZ Karlsruhe ist zertifiziert mit dem Siegel "audit berufundfamilie".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pipermail/orga-semantics-2020/attachments/20191217/6c5901b4/attachment-0003.html>