[Qrowd] comments on section 3.1

[Elena Simperl]

On 10/04/2014 15:04, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 10.04.2014 15:00, schrieb Elena Simperl:
>> ... attached.
>>
>> I am worried about the very generic WP5 description. There are also
>> quite a few inconsistencies and formal issues to be improved. Some tasks
>> run for too long as far as I can tell. This affects mostly WP2, maybe
>> also WP3.
> For WP2, I believe we could go to M24 as end date for the tasks. We
> could also go down from 3 deliverables/releases per task to 2, e.g. in
> M12 and M24. This would mean going from 12 to 8 deliverables for the WP,
> which probably makes more sense and causes less bureaucratic overhead
> when we actually run the project.
I fully agree.
>
> For WP3, we could use a similar approach and have two releases at M15
> and M27 (3 months delay to include WP1 work).
>
> I checked the other comments and they are spot on. Just for
> dissemination, I think this does not necessarily need to be done by an
> academic partner - SWC in LOD2 and Ontos in GeoKnow are doing this very
> well.
I know, it was just a suggestion...
> We can discuss this in the telco and apply the WP2 changes in the next
> integrated version (as we are now already have changes in WP2, 1.2,
> 1.3.3, 1.4, 2.2 just from our side and I don't want Markus to get a
> headache integrating all that ;-) ).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jens
>


-- 
Dr. Elena Simperl
Senior Lecturer
Web and Internet Science Group
Electronics & Computer Science
University of Southampton
email: E.Simperl at soton.ac.uk
twitter: https://twitter.com/esimperl
telefone: +44 2380 59 7692
mobile: +44 7900 666705