[Qrowd] Section 1.4 tables, deliverable descriptions

[Jens Lehmann]

Hello,

Am 22.04.2014 15:29, schrieb Elena Simperl:
> Dear Amrapali and Jens,
> 
> I am writing to you as you kindly coordinated the compilation of Section
> 1.4. It seems this section is very comprehensive and as such formating
> the content using (Google) tables is suboptimal. Would it be possible
> for you to send me a version without tables?
> 
> I did a quick check and we would save one page of text. Also, as the
> table spans over more than 4 pages now, it is hardly readable.

I guess you mean the related activities in 1.3.4? (The 1.4 table is not
long.)

Personally, I think that tables are easier to browse / navigate for
reviewers instead of long texts (for that part of the proposal, the
reviewers just need to see that we did our homework and are aware of
other projects). I just checked the table and content and we can cut it
down to 2 pages by optimising the spacing and reducing the text to the
most relevant parts. Would you be fine with that?

We can also use any table formatting you prefer.

I also checked the deliverables for possibly adding descriptions to
them, but I don't feel comfortable specifying deliverable details for
the business cases (the descriptions would have significant impact if
the project is accepted), so I guess we'll stick to titles only.

Kind regards,

Jens


-- 
Dr. Jens Lehmann
AKSW Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Homepage: http://www.jens-lehmann.org
GPG Key: http://jens-lehmann.org/jens_lehmann.asc