[Qrowd] Section 1.4 tables, deliverable descriptions

[Markus Luczak-Roesch]

Hi all,

I can make a proposal of this table as a textual representation. Give me 
an hour for that.

Markus

On 22/04/2014 15:40, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 22.04.2014 15:29, schrieb Elena Simperl:
>> Dear Amrapali and Jens,
>>
>> I am writing to you as you kindly coordinated the compilation of Section
>> 1.4. It seems this section is very comprehensive and as such formating
>> the content using (Google) tables is suboptimal. Would it be possible
>> for you to send me a version without tables?
>>
>> I did a quick check and we would save one page of text. Also, as the
>> table spans over more than 4 pages now, it is hardly readable.
>
> I guess you mean the related activities in 1.3.4? (The 1.4 table is not
> long.)
>
> Personally, I think that tables are easier to browse / navigate for
> reviewers instead of long texts (for that part of the proposal, the
> reviewers just need to see that we did our homework and are aware of
> other projects). I just checked the table and content and we can cut it
> down to 2 pages by optimising the spacing and reducing the text to the
> most relevant parts. Would you be fine with that?
>
> We can also use any table formatting you prefer.
>
> I also checked the deliverables for possibly adding descriptions to
> them, but I don't feel comfortable specifying deliverable details for
> the business cases (the descriptions would have significant impact if
> the project is accepted), so I guess we'll stick to titles only.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jens
>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------
Dr. Markus Luczak-Rösch
Senior Research Fellow
Web and Internet Science Research Group (WAIS)
Electronics & Computer Science (ECS)
University of Southampton
email: M.Luczak-Rosch at soton.ac.uk
web: www.markus-luczak.de